Skip to main content
Example · Food science

Removing an emulsifier without losing shelf stability

Petal & Grain wanted to remove a synthetic emulsifier from a sauce while keeping its two-week shelf stability, but every substitution separated the product and no known clean-label swap held the emulsion.

Petal & Grain (fictional). This fictional example is for education only. It is not a customer claim or tax advice. It shows how to structure and reason about a SR&ED narrative. Do not copy it into a claim.

Technological uncertainty (T661 line 242)

Weak

We reformulated our sauce to remove an additive, which took a lot of trial and error.

Strong

It was uncertain whether the emulsion could be held for the two-week shelf life without the synthetic emulsifier. Known clean-label alternatives destabilized under the product's pH and thermal-processing conditions, and it was unknown whether any accessible combination could maintain the emulsion through distribution.

'Trial and error' alone does not establish uncertainty. The strong version explains why the known alternatives could not be assumed to work under the specific conditions.

Technological advancement (T661 line 246)

Weak

We found a formulation that works without the additive.

Strong

We advanced our understanding of stabilizing this emulsion at the product's pH: a specific hydrocolloid blend processed in a revised shear sequence held stability across accelerated shelf-life testing. We also established that increasing a single stabilizer caused a texture defect, which ruled out that approach.

The strong version states what was learned about the formulation-process interaction, with a documented failed direction.

Evidence matrix

What could support a claim like this

The matrix pairs each described element with the kind of source that could support it. The actual records still need review.

SourceWhat it shows
Formulation trialsThe substitutions tested and which ones separated
Stability testing dataAccelerated shelf-life results per formulation
Sensory recordsThe texture/appearance outcomes that ruled approaches in or out
Process-run logsThe shear and thermal conditions each trial used

The takeaway

A new flavour does not establish eligibility. Follow the separate stability investigation through its conditions, results and conclusions, then review that work against both CRA requirements.

All examples · SR&ED for Food science

Draft yours from real evidence

Use approved GitHub activity, uploaded documents and project records to prepare an editable narrative draft for review.

7-day free trial · No credit card required